Urban Decay Lush Lash System and Other Eyelash-Boosting Products

August 2014: This action was dismissed with prejudice as to the named plaintiff and without prejudice as to the class members after the case was settled. The settlement terms have not been disclosed.

May 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Urban Decay Cosmetics and L’Oreal alleging that, among other things, the companies falsely advertise the Urban Decay Lush Lash System, Double Extend® Lash Boosting Mascara, and Double Extend® Lash Boosting Serum will make eyelashes grow without scientific evidence to support such claims. (Peña et al v. Urban Decay Cosmetics, LLC and L’Oreal USA, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-03353, S. D. NY.).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits against L’Oreal and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of mascara and TINA.org’s coverage of the topic, click here.

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags:



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates