Whitebridge Pet Brands “Made in USA” Claims

March 2018: This action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

October 2016: A federal judge stayed this action because the named plaintiff in a related case (Ftizpatrick v. Tyson Foods) intends to file an appeal regarding a legal issue (i.e., whether the actions must be dismissed because of changes in California law) that may affect this action.

June 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Whitebridge Pet Brands, LLC for allegedly misleadingly marketing its pet treats as “Made in USA” when, in reality, certain ingredients come from foreign countries. (Marracco et al v. Whitebridge Pet Brands, LLC and Does 1-25, Case No. 16-cv-4009, C. D. CA.)

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding Made in USA claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.

For more information about pets, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates