Wright-Patt Credit Union’s Fees

In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Wright-Patt Credit Union for allegedly misleadingly representing that consumers will only be charged one non-sufficient fund fee on a single transaction when, according to plaintiffs, the credit union regularly charges multiple non-sufficient funds fees on a single transaction. The complaint also claims that the credit union fails to adequately disclose that there are situations when a consumer will be charged multiple out-of-network fees for a single transaction on an ATM that is not a Wright-Patt Credit Union ATM. (Qualls et al v. Wright-Patt Credit Union, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-1965, S. D. OH.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags:



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases